Communications Unlimited Contracting Services, Inc. v. COMDATA INC.
Communications Unlimited Contracting Services, Inc. |
COMDATA INC. |
3:2017cv01158 |
August 16, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Davidson |
Aleta A. Trauger |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 113 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 2/7/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(vh) |
Filing 93 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Comdata's motion to compel is GRANTED IN PART. Issues not addressed by this order have been resolved by the parties, and the motion to compel is FOUND MOOT IN PART as to those claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 2/7/2019. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw) |
Filing 38 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Pending before the court is a Motion to Modify (Docket No. 37 ), filed by the defendant/counter-plaintiff, Comdata, Inc. ("Comdata"). Comdata asks the court to modify its Memorandum and Order entered on May 18, 2 018 (Docket No. 36 ). For the foregoing reasons, Comdata's Motion to Modify is hereby GRANTED. Docket No. 36 at p. 1 will be amended to omit the italicized sentence above and replace it with the following: "In March 2017, CUI contact ed Comdata to protest the configuration, claiming that the limits were supposed to be applied weekly." Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/25/2018. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg) |
Filing 36 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Pending before the court is a Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim (Docket No. 34 ), filed by the plaintiff/counter-defendant, Communications Unlimited Contracting Services, Inc. ("CUI"), to which the defendant/counter-pl aintiff, Comdata, Inc. ("Comdata"), has filed a Response (Docket No. 35 ). For the reasons discussed herein, the motion will be denied. CUI's Motion 34 to Dismiss Counterclaim is hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/18/2018. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg) |
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Metro's Motion to Dismiss is hereby GRANTED in part. Count VI, the unjust enrichment claim, is hereby DISMISSED. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 1/16/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Communications Unlimited Contracting Services, Inc. v. COMDATA INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Communications Unlimited Contracting Services, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Nathaniel Mills Colburn |
Represented By: | Kimberly R. Dodson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: COMDATA INC. | |
Represented By: | Sean C. Kirk |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.