Khenesisiana v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
Phengphanh Khenesisiana |
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Wilson & Associates, PLLC and Makonnen Lema |
Makonnen Lema |
Phengphanh Khenesisiana |
Makonnen Lema |
JP Morgan Chase, N.A. and Wilson & Associates, PLLC |
3:2017cv01264 |
September 14, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Davidson |
Aleta A. Trauger |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT AND ORDER: Accordingly, this court declines to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims and GRANTS Lema's motion to remand. This case is REMANDED to the Chancery Court for Davidson County, Tenne ssee for further proceedings. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 5/4/2018. (Davidson County Chancery Court sent copy of the order by regular mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am) |
Filing 43 Order & Memorandum Opinion: For the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that Plaintiff has not established that her failure to respond to Defendants' motions to dismiss was the result of mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect under Rule 60(b)(1). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Set Aside Order Dismissing Case and To Reconsider Motions to Dismiss is DENIED. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 4/2/2018. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.