Taylor v. United States of America
Petitioner: James Taylor
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 3:2018cv00776
Filed: August 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Marvin E Aspen
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2018 Filing 7 REPLY filed by James Taylor to #4 Response to #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by United States of America. (dt)
September 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: We have reviewed Petitioner James Taylor's motion for an extension of time to file a reply brief in support of his motion to vacate, correct, or set aside his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. (Dkt. No. #5 .) His motion is hereby granted. Petitioner may file a reply brief on or before September 27, 2018. Signed by Judge Marvin E. Aspen on 9/20/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (mg)
September 17, 2018 Filing 5 PETITIONER'S MOTION for Extension of Time to file a Reply to the Government's Response re #4 Response filed by United States of America re #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) by James Taylor. (mg)
August 29, 2018 Filing 4 RESPONSE filed by United States of America re #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by James Taylor . (Attachments: #1 Attachment Second Superseding Indictment, #2 Attachment Minute Entry Plea, #3 Attachment Plea Petition, #4 Attachment Plea Agreement, #5 Attachment Minute Entry Sentencing, #6 Attachment Judgment, #7 Attachment 6th Cir. Case In Re Michael Lee Gordan)(Vincent, Van)
August 27, 2018 TN State Bar status verified as active for Van S. Vincent. (am)
August 24, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Van S. Vincent on behalf of United States of America (Vincent, Van)
August 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: We have received James Taylor's motion to vacate, correct, or set aside his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. (Dkt. No. #1 .) The government shall file a response on or before September 6, 2018. Taylor may file a reply by September 20, 2018. Signed by Judge Marvin E. Aspen on 8/23/2018. (xc:Pro Se party by regular mail.) (mg) Modified text on 8/23/2018 (mg).
August 22, 2018 TN State Bar status verified as active for Brent Adams Hannafan. (afs)
August 22, 2018 Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (afs)
August 20, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by James Taylor. (afs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Brent Adams Hannafan
Represented By: Van S. Vincent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?