Johnson v. Burgess et al
| Ronald Johnson |
| Valarie Burgess, Kim White and Brian Roberts |
| 3:2018cv00856 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: Plaintiff has not paid the civil filing fee, nor has he submitted an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. 1915 (a). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff a blank application to proceed IFP. If Plaintiff seeks to have this Court consider his complaint, he MUST either pay the $400.00 filing fee in full, or complete the application to proceed IFP and return the properly completed application to the Court. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 9/20/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail along with a blank IFP application. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (afs) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (afs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Valarie Burgess, Brian Roberts, Kim White, filed by Ronald Johnson. (afs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
