Reeder v. Cannon County et al
Nickolas Ray Reeder |
Brandon Gullett, Chris Brown, Darrell Young, Cannon County, Roger Young and Other John Doe Deputies of Cannon County |
3:2018cv00885 |
September 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Alistair Newbern |
Eli J Richardson |
Aleta A Trauger |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER: On November 12, 2018, Defendants Cannon County, Brandon Gullett, Darrell Young, Chris Brown, and Roger Young filed a motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. #17 .) Pursuant to Local Rule 7.01(a)(3), any response is to be filed within 14 days after service of the motion. A reply memorandum not to exceed five pages may be filed within 7 days after service of the response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 11/13/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) |
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM in Support of #17 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Chris Brown, Cannon County, Brandon Gullett, Darrell Young, Roger Young . (Schmitt, Michael) |
Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Chris Brown, Cannon County, Brandon Gullett, Darrell Young, Roger Young. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Case: Johnson v. Gannon, #2 Attachment Case: Margeson v. White County, #3 Attachment Case: Minick v. Metro Nashville, #4 Attachment Case: Siler v. Webber)(Schmitt, Michael) |
Filing 16 ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/12/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 774 before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 11/6/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) |
Filing 15 ORDER: Motion for More Definite Statement #7 is DENIED as moot. Defendants shall respond to the Amended Complaint in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of Court, and the Case Management Order to be entered by the Magistrate Judge. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 11/2/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) |
Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Nickolas Ray Reeder, filed by Nickolas Ray Reeder. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint Affidavit)(Thompson, Christopher) |
Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION for More Definite Statement and for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading filed by Chris Brown, Cannon County, Brandon Gullett, Darrell Young, Roger Young. (Schmitt, Michael) |
Filing 12 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01. All existing case management dates, deadlines, and trial settings remain in effect, pending further order of the Court. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 10/29/18. (dt) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION for More Definite Statement and for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading filed by Nickolas Ray Reeder. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Amended Complaint)(Thompson, Christopher) |
Filing 10 ORDER: Pursuant to the division of the docket, this case is transferred to Judge Eli J. Richardson. All previously imposed deadlines and court dates remain unchanged, pending any further order from Judge Richardson. The initial case management conference scheduled for November 19, 2018 before Judge Trauger is hereby CANCELLED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/18/18. (dt) |
Filing 9 ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff shall respond to the Motion for a More Definite Statement (Docket No. #7 ) by October 26, 2018. It is further ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading (Docket No. #7 ) is GRANTED. The defendants need not respond to the Complaint until the court rules on the Motion for More Definite Statement. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/16/18.(dt) Modified on 10/17/2018 (dt). |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Michael T. Schmitt. (dt) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support of #7 MOTION for More Definite Statement and for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading filed by Chris Brown, Cannon County, Brandon Gullett, Darrell Young, Roger Young . (Schmitt, Michael) |
Filing 7 MOTION for More Definite Statement and for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading by Chris Brown, Cannon County, Brandon Gullett, Darrell Young, Roger Young. (Schmitt, Michael) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael T. Schmitt on behalf of Chris Brown, Cannon County, Brandon Gullett, Darrell Young, Roger Young (Schmitt, Michael) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/19/2018 at 2:00 PM in Chambers 825 before District Judge Aleta A. Trauger. (jw) |
Filing 4 Summons issued as to Chris Brown, Cannon County, Brandon Gullett, Darrell Young, Roger Young. Service copies returned to counsel by mail. (jw) |
Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (jw) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Christopher K. Thompson. (jw) |
Filing 2 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Nickolas Ray Reeder. (jw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chris Brown, Cannon County, Brandon Gullett, Other John Doe Deputies of Cannon County, Darrell Young, Roger Young (Filing fee $400, Receipt number 0650-2755325), filed by Nickolas Ray Reeder. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint-Affidavit)(jw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.