Heard v. Lee
Jimmy Heard |
Randy Lee |
3:2019cv00007 |
January 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Aleta A Trauger |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER: On January 30, 2019, the court received the petitioner's request for a hearing and appointment of counsel. (Doc. No. #7 .) The petitioner's request (Doc. No. #7 ) is DENIED AS MOOT, without prejudice to his ability to refile it in the event the Sixth Circuit grants him permission to proceed with this action. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/7/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg) |
***Civil Case Terminated. See Order #6 *** (mg) Modified text on 2/5/2019 (mg). |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jimmy Heard. (mg) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Jimmy Heard, a state prisoner, filed a "Second Amended Petition for the Original Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 U.S.C. 2241" ("Second Amended Petition") (Doc. No. #1 ) in the Eastern District of Tennessee. On December 26, 2018, the Eastern District transferred the Second Amended Petition to this court. (Doc. No. #3 .) For the following reasons, the court concludes that the Second Amended Petition is a second or successive application for habeas relief that the court must transfer to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TRANSFER this action to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and ensure that the Sixth Circuit receives notice of this order. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 1/22/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail and via email to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for T. Austin Watkins. (mg) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by T. Austin Watkins on behalf of Randy Lee (Watkins, T.) |
Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (afs) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Eastern District's Order re #2 Eastern District's Memorandum and Opinion (afs) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Eastern District Memorandum and Opinion re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (afs) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jimmy Heard.(afs) Received from Eastern District on 12/26/18 Modified on 1/8/2019 (afs). |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included) (afs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Heard v. Lee | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Randy Lee | |
Represented By: | T. Austin Watkins |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jimmy Heard | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.