Heard v. Lee
Petitioner: Jimmy Heard
Respondent: Randy Lee
Case Number: 3:2019cv00007
Filed: January 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Aleta A Trauger
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: On January 30, 2019, the court received the petitioner's request for a hearing and appointment of counsel. (Doc. No. #7 .) The petitioner's request (Doc. No. #7 ) is DENIED AS MOOT, without prejudice to his ability to refile it in the event the Sixth Circuit grants him permission to proceed with this action. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/7/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
February 5, 2019 ***Civil Case Terminated. See Order #6 *** (mg) Modified text on 2/5/2019 (mg).
January 30, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jimmy Heard. (mg)
January 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Jimmy Heard, a state prisoner, filed a "Second Amended Petition for the Original Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 U.S.C. 2241" ("Second Amended Petition") (Doc. No. #1 ) in the Eastern District of Tennessee. On December 26, 2018, the Eastern District transferred the Second Amended Petition to this court. (Doc. No. #3 .) For the following reasons, the court concludes that the Second Amended Petition is a second or successive application for habeas relief that the court must transfer to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TRANSFER this action to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and ensure that the Sixth Circuit receives notice of this order. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 1/22/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail and via email to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
January 14, 2019 TN State Bar status verified as active for T. Austin Watkins. (mg)
January 11, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by T. Austin Watkins on behalf of Randy Lee (Watkins, T.)
January 8, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (afs)
January 8, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Eastern District's Order re #2 Eastern District's Memorandum and Opinion (afs)
January 8, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Eastern District Memorandum and Opinion re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (afs)
January 8, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jimmy Heard.(afs) Received from Eastern District on 12/26/18 Modified on 1/8/2019 (afs).
January 8, 2019 Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included) (afs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Heard v. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Randy Lee
Represented By: T. Austin Watkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jimmy Heard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?