Christian v. DCS - State of TN et al
Tonya Christian |
Donna Davenport, Amani Loggins, Una Norwood, DCS - State of TN, Adam T. Dodd, Carl Moore, Shonda Reynolds Christian, Elizabeth Brown, Kiara Davis, Robert E. Lee Davies, Martha Gillipse-Stewart, Chelsea Wade, Caitlyn Febles, Jasmine White and Matthew Wright |
3:2019cv00685 |
August 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Waverly D Crenshaw |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER. For good cause shown, Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs ( #4 ) is GRANTED. However, for the reasons set forth herein, the Complaint is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 9/6/19. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Tonya Christian. (jm) |
Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (jm) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (jm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Tonya Christian. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Supporting Documentation) (jm) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (jm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.