Jones v. The State Administrative High Rank Officers and Staff
| Henry L. Jones |
| The State Administrative High Rank Officers and Staff |
| 3:2019cv00795 |
| September 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Aleta A Trauger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Henry L. Jones. (dt)
|
|
Filing 7
INMATE AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO T.C.A. 41-21-805 et seq. filed by Henry L. Jones. (dt)
|
|
Filing 6
IN FORMA PAUPERIS DECLARATION and Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Henry L. Jones. (dt)
|
|
Filing 5
APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Henry L. Jones. (dt) Modified on 11/7/2019 (dt).
|
|
Filing 4
AMENDED COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by Henry L. Jones. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - supporting documents, #2 Attachment - supporting documents, #3 Attachment - supporting documents, #4 Attachment - supporting documents, #5 Attachment - supporting documents, #6 Attachment - cover letter and envelope)(dt) Modified on 11/7/2019 (dt).
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The court cannot consider this pleading as filed. If the plaintiff seeks to claim that his jailors have violated his constitutional rights, he must file a complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983 naming specific defendants and demanding that relief be awarded. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). At the same time, the plaintiff must either pay the full $400.00 filing fee or file an application for leave to proceed without prepaying the fee. For the plaintiffs benefit, should he wish to proceed in this court, the Clerk SHALL mail the plaintiff a blank Section 1983 complaint form and a blank in forma pauperis application form. These submissions must be RECEIVED in this court within 28 days of the date this order is entered on the docket, and must include the docket number assigned to this case, No. 3:19-cv-00795. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/30/19. (xc:Pro se party w/ IFP form by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (afs)
|
|
(Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (afs)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against The State Administrative High Rank Officers and Staff, filed by Henry L. Jones.(afs)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. The State Administrative High Rank Officers and Staff | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Henry L. Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The State Administrative High Rank Officers and Staff | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
