Hollywood v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff: Francis Hollywood
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv00979
Filed: November 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Aleta A Trauger
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Paige M. Lyle terminated. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 12/19/19. (gb)
December 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Paige M. Lyle by Francis Hollywood. (Lyle, Paige)
December 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Roesch, Charles)
December 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Roesch, Charles)
December 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint by United Parcel Service, Inc..(Roesch, Charles)
December 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed by Francis Hollywood. United Parcel Service, Inc. served on 11/12/2019. (Hunter, Anne)
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for Defendant to file its responsive pleading is extended to December 17, 2019. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 12/4/19. (gb)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed Order)(Roesch, Charles)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons issued as to United Parcel Service, Inc. (gb)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/6/2020 at 02:00 PM in Chambers 825 before District Judge Aleta A. Trauger. (gb)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (gb)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (gb)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order TN State Bar status verified as active for Heather M. Collins, Anne Hunter and Paige M. Lyle. (gb)
November 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United Parcel Service, Inc. (Filing fee paid $400, Receipt number 0650-3024019), filed by Francis Hollywood. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet)(gb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hollywood v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Represented By: Charles M. Roesch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Francis Hollywood
Represented By: Paige M. Lyle
Represented By: Heather M. Collins
Represented By: Anne Hunter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?