Goppert v. Social Security Administration
Daryl Jon Goppert |
Social Security Administration |
SSA-Email Notification |
3:2019cv01019 |
November 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Jeffery S Frensley |
Eli J Richardson |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE: Pursuant to Rule 72 of the FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), this case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for a scheduling order, for decision on all nondispositive matters, and for a Report and Recommendation on disposition of Plaintiff's Complaint for judicial review of the decision of the Social Security Administration. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 1/3/2020. (hb) |
Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (gb) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Nan Shelby Calloway. (gb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Nan Shelby Calloway on behalf of Daryl Jon Goppert. (gb) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Daryl Jon Goppert. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed Order)(gb) |
Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, filed by Daryl Jon Goppert. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet)(gb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.