Washington v. Gentry et al
| Ernest Washington |
| Davidson County Sheriff Office, Beth Gentry and Tony M. Wilkes |
| 3:2019cv01119 |
| December 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #2 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to remit the full $400.00 filing fee within 28 days from the date of entry of this Order. At the same time, Plaintiff MUST show cause why he should not be sanctioned for falsely indicating in his certified complaint that he has never filed any previous lawsuits in state or federal court. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 1/9/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)
|
| Filing 4 Letter from Ernest Washington. (gb) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (afs) |
| (Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (afs) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Ernest Washington. (afs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Davidson County Sheriff Office, Beth Gentry, Tony M. Wilkes, filed by Ernest Washington.(afs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
