JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Ascend Federal Credit Union
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
| Ascend Federal Credit Union |
| 3:2020cv00965 |
| November 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Alistair Newbern |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28:1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TN State Bar status verified as active for James Davidson Lane, II admitted to this court. (vh) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by James Davidson Lane, II on behalf of Ascend Federal Credit Union (Lane, James) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Ascend Federal Credit Union.(Edmondson, Thomas) |
Filing 9
ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/13/2021 at 11:00 AM will be held by telephone. Counsel for each party shall call (888) 557-8511 and enter access code 7819165# to participate. Counsel need not and should not appear in person. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 12/28/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(vh)
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Ascend Federal Credit Union served on 11/20/2020. (Schwegler, Michael) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (dt) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/13/2021 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 774 before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (dt) |
| Filing 5 Summons issued as to Ascend Federal Credit Union. (Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail.) (dt) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (dt) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Michael B. Schwegler and Elizabeth Anne Bowden admitted to this court. (dt) |
| Filing 3 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (dt) |
| Filing 2 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (dt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ascend Federal Credit Union (Filing fee $400, Receipt number 0650-3253038), filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Check dated 9/9/2019, #2 Exhibit B - Letter dated 10/9/2019, #3 Exhibit C - Letter 10/1/2019, #4 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(dt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Ascend Federal Credit Union | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Michael B. Schwegler |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Anne Bowden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ascend Federal Credit Union | |
| Represented By: | James Davidson Lane, II |
| Represented By: | Thomas Larry Edmondson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
