Hudson et al v. CoreCivic et al
| Mateem Hudson and Nathaniel Brinson |
| Josh Lyons, CoreCivic, Vincent Vanteel, Dana Thomas and Raymond Byrd |
| 3:2021cv00319 |
| April 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Aleta A Trauger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg)
|
|
Filing 6
DECLARATION of In Support of Request for Leave to Proeed In Forma Pauperis filed by Mateem Hudson. (mg)
|
|
Filing 5
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Mateem Hudson. (mg)
|
|
Filing 4
DECLARATION of in Support of Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Mateem Hudson re: #2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. (mg)
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM in Support of #2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Mateem Hudson. (mg)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Mateem Hudson. (mg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Raymond Byrd, CoreCivic, Josh Lyons, Dana Thomas, Vincent Vanteel, filed by Mateem Hudson.(mg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/21/2021: #1 Attachment - Notice, #2 Attachment - Envelope) (mg).
|
|
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (mg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
