Thompson v. Stephens
Connor Thompson |
Maggie Lee Stephens |
3:2022cv00094 |
February 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
William L Campbell |
Barbara D Holmes |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone is reset for 5/17/2022 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. See Docket Entry No. #5 for dial-in instructions. Plaintiff's counsel shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 3/28/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) |
Filing 7 ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone is reset for 4/12/2022 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. See Docket Entry No. 5 for dial-in instructions. Plaintiff's counsel shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 3/21/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) |
Filing 6 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 2/16/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(bs) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 4/7/2022 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (dt) |
Filing 4 Summons issued as to Maggie Lee Stephens. (Service copies returned to counsel by mail.) (dt) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (dt) |
Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (dt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Maggie Lee Stephens (Filing fee $402, Receipt number 0650-3531647), filed by Connor Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 02.05.2021 Gab Post, #2 Exhibit B - 02.06.2021 Gab Post, #3 Exhibit C - 02.09.2021 Gab Post, #4 Exhibit D - 02.13.2021 Gab Post, #5 Exhibit E - 02.14.2021 Gab Post, #6 Exhibit F - 02.15.2021 Gab Post, #7 Exhibit G - 03.25.2021 Gab Post, #8 Exhibit H - D Internet Posting, #9 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet)(dt) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Andrew P. Goldstein and Paul E. Tennison admitted to this court. (dt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Thompson v. Stephens | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Connor Thompson | |
Represented By: | Andrew P. Goldstein |
Represented By: | Paul E. Tennison |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Maggie Lee Stephens | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.