Tidwell v. Kijakazi
| Michael Wayne Tidwell |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| SSA-Email Notification |
| 3:2022cv00185 |
| March 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #5 : Having satisfied the requirements of Local Rule 83.01(b), the Motion for David F. Chermol to Appear Pro Hac Vice is granted. Signed by Lynda Hill, Clerk of Court, on 04/01/2022. (lh)
|
| Filing 10 RECEIPT #34675065445 in the amount of $150.00 posted by Michael Wayne Tidwell re #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (bs) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Kilolo Kijakazi, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Service copies returned to counsel by mail.) (bs) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Summons to be Issued as to United States Attorneys Office for the Middle District TN, Office of Regional Chief Counsel, United States Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed Summons USAG, #2 Attachment Proposed Summons USAO)(Chermol, David) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Michael Patrick Williamson admitted to this court. (bs) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Patrick Williamson on behalf of Michael Wayne Tidwell (Williamson, Michael) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Cost (Docket No. #2 ) is GRANTED. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case to dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and to conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., and Local Rules of Court. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 3/21/2022. (bs)
|
| Filing 5 First MOTION for attorney David F. Chermol to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Fee not paid-due within 21 days) by Michael Wayne Tidwell. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed Order, #2 Attachment Certificate of Good Standing)(Chermol, David) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (bs) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (bs) |
| PA State Bar status verified as active for David F. Chermol not admitted to this court - Local counsel required. (bs) |
| NOTICE TO COUNSEL David F. Chermol: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall associate local counsel qualified to practice in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. Local counsel shall electronically file a Notice of Appearance (LR 83.01(d)). Appearance by local counsel due by 4/7/2022. (bs) |
| NOTICE TO COUNSEL David F. Chermol: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, a Certificate of Good Standing signed by the Clerk of a United States District Court or a U. S. appellate court where admitted, and pay a fee of $150.00 (LR 83.01(b)). PHV due by 4/7/2022. (bs) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Michael Wayne Tidwell. (bs) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi (Filing fee $0) filed by Michael Wayne Tidwell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
