Johnson v. Frink
| Charles Randolph Johnson |
| Warden Martin Frink |
| 3:2022cv00298 |
| April 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Aleta A Trauger |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE of Case transferred from Tennessee Middle has been opened in U.S. District Court - Eastern District of Tennessee as case 3:22-cv-00171, filed 05/17/2022. (bs) |
Filing 8
ORDER: Because the petitioner subsequently paid the filing fee (Doc. No. #7 ), his application to proceed as a pauper (Doc. No. #4 ) is DENIED as moot. This action will be transferred to the Eastern District of Tennessee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Northern Division at Knoxville. 28 U.S.C. 123(a)(1). The petitioner should send all future submissions in this case to the Eastern District of Tennessee. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/10/2022. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
| Case electronically transferred to Eastern District of Tennessee, Northern Division at Knoxville on this date. (hb) |
| Filing 7 RECEIPT #34675065775 in the amount of $5.00 posted by Charles Randolph Johnson re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (jm) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for John H. Bledsoe, III admitted to this court. (jm) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by John H. Bledsoe, III on behalf of Martin Frink (Bledsoe, John) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (jm) |
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Charles Randolph Johnson. (jm) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Charles Randolph Johnson. (jm) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (jm) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (jm) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Charles Randolph Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing re request for certified copies #2 Memorandum of Law in Support of Dismissal with Prejudice) (jm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Frink | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Charles Randolph Johnson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Martin Frink | |
| Represented By: | John H. Bledsoe, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
