Eastep v. City of Nashville, Tennessee et al
Chelesy Eastep |
City of Nashville, Tennessee, Brian Murphy, Steven Carrick, Edin Plancic, Sean Williams, Justsin Pinkelton, James Kidd, Fajan Llukaj, Reggie Edge, Jr., Charles Achinger and City of Mt. Juliet, Tennessee |
3:2022cv00721 |
September 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Waverly D Crenshaw |
Alistair Newbern |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 REPLY to Response to re #25 First MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Chelesy Eastep. (Medley, Barbara) |
Filing 30 ORDER granting #25 Motion to Continue ICMC. The conference will be reset after the Court resolves the motion to stay #20 and all defendants have appeared. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 11/7/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc) |
Filing 29 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda Shanan Jordan on behalf of Charles Achinger, Reggie Edge, Jr (Jordan, Amanda) |
Filing 28 NOTICE of Appearance by Meghan Murphy on behalf of Charles Achinger, Reggie Edge, Jr (Murphy, Meghan) |
Filing 27 SUMMONS returned executed by Chelesy Eastep. Reggie Edge, Jr served on 11/2/2022. (Medley, Barbara) |
Filing 26 SUMMONS returned executed by Chelesy Eastep. Charles Achinger served on 11/2/2022. (Medley, Barbara) |
Filing 25 First MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference by City of Nashville, Tennessee. (Roberge, Melissa) |
Filing 24 REPLY to Response to re #20 MOTION to Stay filed by City of Nashville, Tennessee. (Roberge, Melissa) |
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM in Support of #21 Memorandum in Support, #22 Response in Opposition to Motion, #20 MOTION to Stay filed by Chelesy Eastep . (Medley, Barbara) |
Filing 22 RESPONSE in Opposition re #20 MOTION to Stay filed by Chelesy Eastep. (Medley, Barbara) |
Filing 21 MEMORANDUM in Support of #20 MOTION to Stay filed by City of Nashville, Tennessee . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Memorandum of Understanding)(Roberge, Melissa) |
Filing 20 MOTION to Stay by City of Nashville, Tennessee. (Roberge, Melissa) |
Filing 19 SUMMONS returned executed by Chelesy Eastep. Reggie Edge, Jr served on 9/29/2022. (Medley, Barbara) |
Filing 18 SUMMONS returned executed by Chelesy Eastep. Charles Achinger served on 9/29/2022. (Medley, Barbara) |
Filing 17 SUMMONS returned executed by Chelesy Eastep. Fajan Llukaj served on 9/29/2022. (Medley, Barbara) |
Filing 16 SUMMONS returned executed by Chelesy Eastep. City of Mt. Juliet, Tennessee served on 9/29/2022. (Medley, Barbara) |
Filing 15 SUMMONS returned executed by Chelesy Eastep. Justsin Pinkelton served on 9/29/2022. (Medley, Barbara) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS returned executed by Chelesy Eastep. Edin Plancic served on 9/29/2022. (Medley, Barbara) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS returned executed by Chelesy Eastep. Steven Carrick served on 9/29/2022. (Medley, Barbara) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS returned executed by Chelesy Eastep. Brian Murphy served on 9/29/2022. (Medley, Barbara) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS returned executed by Chelesy Eastep. James Kidd served on 9/29/2022. (Medley, Barbara) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS returned executed by Chelesy Eastep. City of Nashville, Tennessee served on 9/29/2022. (Medley, Barbara) |
NOTICE TO FILER re DE# 9 : Discovery is not filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(d)(1). This document is deleted from the docket. (kc) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by City of Mt. Juliet, Tennessee, Fajan Llukaj OF SERVICE OF SUBPOENA TO TN BUREAU OF INV. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment TBI Subpoena 9.29.22)(Burns, Robert) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Robert M. Burns, Samantha A. Burnett admitted to this court. (kc) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Samantha A. Burnett on behalf of City of Mt. Juliet, Tennessee, Fajan Llukaj (Burnett, Samantha) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert M. Burns on behalf of Fajan Llukaj (Burns, Robert) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Robert M. Burns admitted to this court. (kc) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert M. Burns on behalf of City of Mt. Juliet, Tennessee (Burns, Robert) |
Filing 5 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 9/21/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc) |
Filing 4 Summons issued as to Charles Achinger, Steven Carrick, City of Nashville, Tennessee, Reggie Edge, Jr, James Kidd, Fajan Llukaj, Brian Murphy, Justsin Pinkelton, Edin Plancic, Sean Williams. (Service packet returned to counsel by regular mail.) (kc) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone is set for 11/10/2022 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (kc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for David J. McKenzie, Barbara G. Medley admitted to this court. (kc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charles Achinger, Steven Carrick, City of Nashville, Tennessee, Reggie Edge, Jr, James Kidd, Fajan Llukaj, Brian Murphy, Justsin Pinkelton, Edin Plancic, Sean Williams (Filing fee $402, Receipt number BTNMDC-3667713), filed by Chelesy Eastep. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(kc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.