Castro v. CoreCivic Inc.
Mark Castro |
CoreCivic Inc., CoreCivic, Inc., Raymond Byrd, John Doe, Terrance Levach, Jane Doe, Ms. f/n/u Van Dyke, Ms. f/n/u Davis and Ms. f/n/u McCarty |
3:2022cv00948 |
November 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
William L Campbell |
Alistair Newbern |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Notice, Consent and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge by Mark Castro (Only signed by Mark Castro.) (ad) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (ad) |
Filing 5 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (ad) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (ad) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM in Support of #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Mark Castro. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Sworn Statement of Mark Castro, #2 Attachment - Sworn Statement of James Lackey)(ad) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Mark Castro. (ad) Modified on 11/23/2022 (ad). |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Mark Castro. (ad) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CoreCivic Inc., filed by Mark Castro. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Envelope)(ad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.