Curran v. State of Tennessee
| John F. Curran |
| State of Tennessee |
| 3:2024cv00691 |
| June 5, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Amend and Supplemental Argument re #7 Order Dismissing Case by John F. Curran. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A and B, #2 Attachment - Cover Letter)(kc) |
| Filing 12 SUPPLEMENT filed by John F. Curran re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C, #2 Attachment - Cover Letter)(kc) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Release on Bond During Pendency of Writ of Habeas Corpus by John F. Curran. (kc) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Order to Show Cause by John F. Curran. (kc) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Set Aside #7 Order Dismissing Case by John F. Curran. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Cover Letter)(kc) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by John F. Curran. (kc) |
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: In light of Petitioner's failure to exhaust his available remedies in the courts of the state before filing in federal court, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling after such remedies have been exhausted. The Clerk SHALL close the file of this case. Signed by Chief Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 7/9/2024. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Consent of the Parties to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. (Consent is only signed by pro se plaintiff.) (kc) |
| Filing 5 SECOND PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by John F. Curran. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Argument, #2 Attachment - Facts, #3 Exhibit A1-C, #4 Attachment - Cover Letter)(kc) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by John F. Curran. (kc) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (am) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (am) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by John F. Curran. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Admiralty Jurisdiction and Maritime Law, #2 Attachment - Petition for Challenge to Extradition, #3 Attachment - Cover Letter)(am) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (am) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Curran v. State of Tennessee | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: John F. Curran | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State of Tennessee | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
