Rumfelt v. Humphreys County
| Tammy Rumfelt |
| Humphreys County |
| 3:2024cv01092 |
| September 10, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2611 Family Medical Leave Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER finding as moot #9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 10/15/2024. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Tammy Rumfelt. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Administrators Interpretation)(Zenner, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT First against Tammy Rumfelt, filed by Tammy Rumfelt.(Zenner, Matthew) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Michael T. Schmitt admitted to this court. (kc) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support of #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Humphreys County . (Schmitt, Michael) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Humphreys County. (Schmitt, Michael) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael T. Schmitt on behalf of Humphreys County (Schmitt, Michael) |
| Filing 7 Summons issued as to Humphreys County. (kc) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone is set for 1/2/2025 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (kc) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 9/11/2024. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Tammy Rumfelt Summons to be Issued (Zenner, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (kc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Humphreys County (Filing fee $405, Receipt number BTNMDC-4159112), filed by Tammy Rumfelt. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(kc) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Matthew R. Zenner admitted to this court. (kc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rumfelt v. Humphreys County | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tammy Rumfelt | |
| Represented By: | Matthew R. Zenner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Humphreys County | |
| Represented By: | Michael T. Schmitt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
