Smiley v. City of Memphis et al
John Smiley, Sr. |
Rutherford County, Memphis Police Department, City of Nashville, Metropolitan Nashville Police Department, City of Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, City of Atlanta, Georgia, City of Memphis, Wilson County, Davidson County, DeSoto County, Mississippi and Shelby County |
3:2024cv01512 |
December 30, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Aleta A Trauger |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (kc) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by John Smiley, Sr. (kc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Atlanta, Georgia, City of Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, City of Memphis, City of Nashville, Davidson County, DeSoto County, Mississippi, Memphis Police Department, Metropolitan Nashville Police Department, Rutherford County, Shelby County, Wilson County, filed by John Smiley, Sr.(kc) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (kc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.