Stanley v. Crown Bakeries, LLC
| Amanda Stanley |
| Crown Bakeries, LLC |
| 3:2025cv00293 |
| March 12, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff brings this case as a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 216(b), and seeks initial relief of court-authorized procedures for notice to potentially similarly situated employees/plaintiffs. (Docket No. #1 .) The procedures detailed below shall govern any motion for the preliminary notice procedures and for final determination of "similarly situated" employees. See e.g. Clark v A&L Homecare and Training Center, LLC, 68 F.4th 1003 (6th Cir. 2023). Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 04/10/2025. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ad)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the Court in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01(h). Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 3/14/2025. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ch)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 6/17/2025 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (mg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (mg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (mg) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Gordon E. Jackson, J. Russ Bryant, John Joseph Leatherwood, IV, Joshua Dixon Autry admitted to this court. (mg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Crown Bakeries, LLC (Filing fee $405, Receipt number ATNMDC-4278323), filed by Amanda Stanley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to join, #2 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stanley v. Crown Bakeries, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amanda Stanley | |
| Represented By: | Joshua Dixon Autry |
| Represented By: | John Joseph Leatherwood, IV |
| Represented By: | J. Russ Bryant |
| Represented By: | Gordon E. Jackson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Crown Bakeries, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
