Civitts v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
Plaintiff: Warner Civitts
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security and SSA-Email Notification
Case Number: 3:2025cv00452
Filed: April 22, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Jeffery S Frensley
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2025 Filing 7 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Entry by Warner Civitts. (Foster, Jennifer)
April 22, 2025 Filing 6 First MOTION for attorney Maren Miller Bam to Appear Pro Hac Vice (paid $150 PHV fee; receipt number ATNMDC-4307308) by Warner Civitts. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Attachment updated admissions)(Foster, Jennifer)
April 22, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE of Consent of the Parties to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. (Foster, Jennifer)
April 22, 2025 Filing 4 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF THE PARTIES TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES ARISING UNDER 42 U.S.C. 405(g) (ad)
April 22, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (ad)
April 22, 2025 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Warner Civitts. (ad)
April 22, 2025 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Warner Civitts. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet)(ad)
April 22, 2025 TN State Bar status verified as active for Jennifer Lynn Foster admitted to this court. (ad)
April 22, 2025 WA State Bar status verified as active for Maren Miller Bam not admitted to this court - Local counsel secured. (ad)
April 22, 2025 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Maren Miller Bam: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, a Certificate of Good Standing signed by the Clerk of a United States District Court or a U. S. appellate court where admitted, and pay a fee of $150.00 (LR 83.01(b)). PHV due by 5/13/2025. (ad)
April 22, 2025 NOTICE TO FILER re DE#1 : This document has been scanned. Documents generated from a word processor (Word or WordPerfect) should NOT be scanned, but rather printed directly to PDF via a PDF writer. Document must be text searchable. You do not have to refile this document, however, future scanned pleadings of this nature may require refiling. (ad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Civitts v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Warner Civitts
Represented By: Maren Miller Bam
Represented By: Jennifer Lynn Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SSA-Email Notification
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?