Nixon v. Waste Management Inc, et al
| 1:2003cv01144 |
| June 10, 2003 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Jackson Office |
| S. Thomas Anderson |
| James D. Todd |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER (re 49 ORDER OF REFERENCE): Counsel are directed to confer regarding propsed deadlines and a new trial date and submit to the Court within 20 days from entry of this Order a proposed Amended Scheduling Order which is consistent with the Court's normal Scheduling Order. If counsel is unable to agree as to an Amended Scheduling Order, they shall notify the Judge's Chambers and a Scheduling Conference will be held . Signed by Judge S. Thomas Anderson. (cdi, )
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER OF REFERENCE: This case having been remanded re 48 by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals for further proceedings, this case is REFERRED to US Magistrate Judge S. Thomas Anderson to conduct a new scheduling conference . Signed by Judge James D. Todd. (cdi, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nixon v. Waste Management Inc, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
