Peck v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Tenisha Peck
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2014cv01252
Filed: September 26, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Office: Jackson Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: James D. Todd
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:1383
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 24 JUDGMENT. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 9/14/2017. (Anderson, S. Thomas)
August 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER BRIEFING. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 8/31/17. (Anderson, S. Thomas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peck v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tenisha Peck
Represented By: John D. Hamilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?