Koenigs L.L.C. v. City of Savannah, Tennessee et al
Koenigs L.L.C. |
City of Savannah, Tennessee, Garry Welch, Ricky Bratton, Curtis Mansfield, Jr. and John Albertson, III |
1:2017cv01109 |
June 9, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Jackson Office |
Madison |
S. Thomas Anderson |
Edward G. Bryant |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 65 JUDGMENT. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 7/29/2019. (mbb) |
Filing 64 ORDER GRANTING CITY DEFENDANTS' 50 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 7/19/19. (mbm) |
Filing 63 ORDER GRANTING STATE DEFENDANTS' 51 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 7/18/19. (mbm) |
Filing 48 ORDER GRANTING RICKY BRATTON'S, CURTIS MANFIELD JR.'S, AND JOHN ALBERTSON III'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 3/13/19. (mbm) |
Filing 38 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART GARRY WELCH'S AND THE CITY'S SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS 34 . Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 4/23/18. (skc) |
Filing 33 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART STATE DEFENDANTS' 27 SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING STATE DEFENDANTS' 17 FIRST MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT; AND DENYING CITY DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT 18 . Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 2/1/18. (skc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.