Matthews v. Hardeman County Corr. Facility et al
| Antwane Matthews |
| Hardeman County Corr. Facility and Anthony Blackwell |
| 1:2020cv01081 |
| April 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| James D Todd |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND ASSESSING $350 FILING FEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLRA. Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 4/8/2020. (mbm)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 3 Pro Se MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Antwane Matthews. (csf) |
| Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Antwane Matthews. (Attachments: #1 Prison Trust Fund Affidavit/Balance)(csf) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 filed by Antwane Matthews against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Statement of Facts, #2 Inmate Grievances, #3 Civil Summons, #4 Envelope, #5 Magistrate Card)(csf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/8/2020: #6 District Judge Card) (cdi). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
