Montgomery v. Saul
Plaintiff: Terry Montgomery
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 1:2021cv01018
Filed: January 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: J Daniel Breen
Referring Judge: Charmiane G Claxton
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 427
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2021 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Saul, #2 Summons - Barr)(mbm)
February 9, 2021 Civil Filing fee $ 402 paid, receipt number ATNWDC-3542647. (Craig, Jackson)
February 5, 2021 Appeals Filing fee $ 505 paid, receipt number ATNWDC-3540996. (Craig, Jackson)
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S #2 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 2/2/2021. (mbm)
January 25, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (skc)
January 25, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Administrative track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (skc)
January 25, 2021 Filing 3 Judge J. Daniel Breen and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (Attachments: #1 Judge Card) (skc)
January 25, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis proposed order submitted by Terry Montgomery. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Craig, Jackson)
January 25, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Andrew Saul, filed by Terry Montgomery. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to United States Attorney, #3 Summons to Commissioner of SSA, #4 Summons to Attorney General)(Craig, Jackson)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Montgomery v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terry Montgomery
Represented By: Jackson Craig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?