Nunnery et al v. RRD Financial Services, Inc et al
| Amy Blalock, Glenda Simpson, Brandon Bryant, Steven Nunnery and John Simpson |
| Jackson Hewitt, Inc. and RRD Financial Services, Inc |
| 1:2021cv01045 |
| March 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| S Thomas Anderson |
| Jon A York |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT RRD FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.'S UNOPPOSED #22 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 5/6/2021. (mbm)
|
| Filing 22 Proposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, proposed order submitted by RRD Financial Services, Inc. (Shumate, Thomas) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Wormouth Shumate, IV on behalf of RRD Financial Services, Inc (Shumate, Thomas) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER GRANTING #17 MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 5/5/2021. (mbm)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER GRANTING #15 MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 5/5/2021. (mbm)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER GRANTING #16 MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 5/5/2021. (mbm)
|
| Filing 17 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Rebecca Starner, Esq. (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-3601543) by Jackson Hewitt, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Starner, Rebecca) Corrected filing party on 5/4/2021 (cbs). |
| Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Colleen Fox, Esq. (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-3601525) by Jackson Hewitt, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fox, Colleen) Corrected filing party on 5/4/2021 (cbs). |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Francis X. Riley III, Esq. (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-3601209) by Jackson Hewitt, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Riley, Francis) Corrected filing party on 5/4/2021 (cbs). |
|
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JACKSON HEWITT, INC.'S UNOPPOSED #13 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 4/27/2021. (mbm)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Defendant Jackson Hewitt, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum in Support (Proposed Order Submitted) by Jackson Hewitt, Inc.. (Laurenzi, Lawrence) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by William David Irvine on behalf of Jackson Hewitt, Inc. (Irvine, William) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Lawrence Laurenzi on behalf of Jackson Hewitt, Inc. (Laurenzi, Lawrence) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Glenda Simpson, Steven Nunnery, John Simpson, Amy Blalock, Brandon Bryant as to Jackson Hewitt, Inc.. (Weinman, Michael) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Glenda Simpson, Steven Nunnery, John Simpson, Amy Blalock, Brandon Bryant as to RRD Financial Services, Inc. (Weinman, Michael) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert E. Morelli, III on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Morelli, Robert) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Russ Bryant on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Bryant, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (Attachments: #1 Summons - RRD)(mbm) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (mbm) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (mbm) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mbm) |
| Filing 2 Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson and Magistrate Judge Jon A. York added. (mbm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jackson Hewitt, Inc., RRD Financial Services, Inc (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3570569), filed by Glenda Simpson, Steven Nunnery, John Simpson, Amy Blalock, Brandon Bryant. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons -Jackson Hewitt, Inc., #3 Summons - RRD Financial Services, Inc.)(Weinman, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
