Jones v. White et al
| Albert Jones |
| S. White and Eric Bryant |
| 1:2021cv01149 |
| October 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Tu M Pham |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
JUDGMENT dismissing case without prejudice in accordance with the Order docketed on 12/03/2021, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 12/03/2021. (Mays, Samuel)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, dismissing the case without prejudice, and assessing the $402 civil filing fee, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 12/03/2021. (Mays, Samuel)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER directing Plaintiff to comply with 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2) or pay the $402 civil fillng fee, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 10/07/2021. (Mays, Samuel)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mbm) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Albert Jones. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(mbm) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Albert Jones. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(mbm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/7/2021: #2 Judicial Cards) (csf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
