Pruitt v. Shepard et al
AT Pruitt |
Jeremy Shepard, Warden Adams, MS Stewert, Sexton and Warden Tammy Ford |
1:2024cv01168 |
August 15, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Samuel H Mays |
Tu M Pham |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Letter from AT Pruitt requesting cast status. (Attachments: #1 envelope) (mf) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and assessing $350.00 filing fee in accordance with the PLRA and directing clerk to mail Order, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 10/01/2024. (Mays, Samuel) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by AT Pruitt. (jae) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by AT Pruitt. (Attachments: #1 trust fund statement)(jae) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights under 42 USC 1983 against Adams, Tammy Ford, Sexton, Jeremy Shepard, MS Stewert, filed by AT Pruitt. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 envelope)(jae) |
Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-01 case reassigned to Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham. (jae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.