B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Apple Inc. Featured Case

Plaintiff: B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Case Number: 2:2012cv02831
Filed: September 22, 2012
Court: Tennessee Western District Court
Office: Memphis Office
County: Shelby
Referring Judge: Charmiane G. Claxton
Presiding Judge: Samuel H. Mays
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

We have record of the following docket entries for this case:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 22, 2012 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Apple Inc. (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0651-1562479), filed by B.E. Technology, L.L.C.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons)(Freitas, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Apple Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
Represented By: Richard M. Carter
Represented By: Robert Edward Freitas
Represented By: Craig Robert Kaufman
Represented By: Hsiang Hong Lin
Represented By: Qudus B. Olaniran
Represented By: Adam Calhoun Simpson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?