Church Joint Venture, a limited partnership v. Blasingame et al
||Church Joint Venture, a limited partnership
||Earl Benard Blasingame, Margaret Gooch Blasingame, Katherine Blasingame Church, Earl Benard "Be Blasingame, Jr., Blasingame Family Business Investment Trust, Blasingame Family Residence Generation Skip Children Trust, The Blasingame Trust, Flozone Services Inc, Fiberzone Technologies Inc and G F Corporation
||November 16, 2012
||US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 8, 2017
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 226 Defendants' Motion for Clarification. Signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr on 08/08/2017. (Mays, Samuel)
|March 9, 2017
ORDER denying 191 Motion to Strike and addressing 198 , 199 , 200 , and 201 parties' memoranda and responses regarding issues remaining for trial. Signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr on 03/09/2017. (Mays, Samuel)
|November 17, 2016
ORDER granting 155 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 156 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 158 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 159 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting in part and denying in part 159 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 160 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 160 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 174 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr on 11/17/16. (Mays, Samuel)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?