Michael LeVally v. Kroger Co.(THE) et al

Plaintiff: Michael LeVally
Defendant: Kroger Co.(THE) and Kroger Limited Partnership I
Case Number: 2:2013cv02069
Filed: February 1, 2013
Court: Tennessee Western District Court
Office: Memphis Office
County: Shelby
Presiding Judge: Diane K. Vescovo
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2003 Job Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michael LeVally v. Kroger Co.(THE) et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael LeVally
Represented By: Donald A. Donati
Represented By: Janelle A. Crandall
Represented By: Bryce William Ashby
Represented By: William B. Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kroger Co.(THE)
Represented By: David P. Jaqua
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kroger Limited Partnership I
Represented By: David P. Jaqua
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.