Burton v. City of Memphis et al
Plaintiff: Cynthia M.P. Burton
Defendant: A.C. Wharton, Memphis Police Department, James A. Walton and City of Memphis
Case Number: 2:2013cv02070
Filed: February 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Office: Memphis Office
County: Shelby
Presiding Judge: Charmiane G. Claxton
Presiding Judge: James D. Todd
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER ADOPTING 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT DEFENDANT'S 22 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENY PLAINTIFF'S 27 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, CERTIFYING AN APPEAL WOULD NOT BE TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH, AND DENYING LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 11/26/14. (Todd, James)
November 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 22 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment and 27 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Objections to R&R due by 11/21/2014. ORDER DENYING 28 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton on 11/07/2014. (Claxton, Charmiane)
October 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 7 , ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL AND ORDER CERTIFYING AN INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL WOULD NOT BE TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH. Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 10/31/13. (Todd, James)
October 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER to Issue and Effect Service of Process; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on In Forma Pauperis Screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915 and on Certification of Appealability pursuant to Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Objections to R&R due by 10/24/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton on 10/10/2013. (Claxton, Charmiane)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burton v. City of Memphis et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A.C. Wharton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Memphis Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James A. Walton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Memphis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynthia M.P. Burton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?