Tennco Holdings, LLC v. KingSid Ventures, Ltd. et al
| Tennco Holdings, LLC |
| Krystal Young and KingSid Ventures, Ltd. |
| Donna L. Russell |
| 2:2018cv02620 |
| September 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| John T Fowlkes |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 REPLY to Response to Motion re #15 Response in Opposition to Motion to Consolidate filed by KingSid Ventures, Ltd.. (Allen, Jeffrey) |
Filing 23
ORDER granting DE #18 Motion for Leave to File signed by Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr. on 10/25/2018. (Fowlkes, John)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER granting DE #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply signed by Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr. on 10/25/2018. (Fowlkes, John)
|
| Filing 21 MOTION for Leave to File Reply to KingSid's Opposition to Remand with proposed order submitted by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Motion)(Wade, Allan) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE to Motion re #14 MOTION to Remand proposed order submitted and Joinder to Motion filed by Krystal Young. (Spence, Robert) |
| Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint by Krystal Young.(Spence, Robert) |
| Filing 18 MOTION for Leave to File Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Consolidate (proposed order submitted) by KingSid Ventures, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Defendant KingSid Ventures, Ltd.'s Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Consolidate)(Allen, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE by KingSid Ventures, Ltd. re #16 Response in Opposition to Motion of Plaintiff to Remand Case to State Court (Notice of Filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Gray Anderson (with Exhibits 1 through 7), #2 Exhibit B - Declaration of Dennis King (with Collective Exhibit 1), #3 Exhibit C - Declaration of Jonathan C. Callister, Esq. (with Exhibits 1 through 4))(Allen, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION to Remand proposed order submitted filed by KingSid Ventures, Ltd.. (Allen, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Consolidate Cases , proposed order submitted filed by All Plaintiffs. (Wade, Allan) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Remand proposed order submitted by Tennco Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Affidavit, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3)(Wade, Allan) |
| Filing 13 SETTING LETTER: [TEXT ONLY - NO IMAGE ATTACHED] Status / Scheduling Conference set for 11/9/2018 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 - Memphis before Judge John T. Fowlkes Jr.. Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-02499-JTF-cgc, 2:18-cv-02620-JTF-cgc(wrh) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 MOTION to Consolidate Cases , proposed order submitted proposed order submitted by Tennco Holdings, LLC. (Wade, Allan) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristina A. Woo on behalf of Krystal Young (Woo, Kristina) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert L. J. Spence, Jr on behalf of Krystal Young (Spence, Robert) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION to Consolidate Cases , proposed order submitted filed by KingSid Ventures, Ltd.. (Allen, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Consolidate Cases , proposed order submitted by KingSid Ventures, Ltd.. (Allen, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint, proposed order submitted by KingSid Ventures, Ltd.. (Allen, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jld) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jld) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jld) |
| Filing 3 Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (jld) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Samuel D. Lipshie on behalf of KingSid Ventures, Ltd. (Lipshie, Samuel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by KingSid Ventures, Ltd. from Shelby County Chancery Court, case number CH-18-1033-1 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNWDC-2874153), filed by KingSid Ventures, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Process, Pleadings, and Orders)(Allen, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
