Biggs v. Nike, Inc. et al
| Charlesetta Biggs |
| Nike, Inc. and Securian Life Insurance Company |
| 2:2018cv02687 |
| October 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Sheryl H Lipman |
| Mark S Norris |
| Tu M Pham |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. § 1002 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Securian Life Insurance Company.(Simpkins, Kelly) |
Filing 22
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE per Administrative Order 2018-30. Case reassigned to Judge Mark S. Norris for all further proceedings. Judge Sheryl H. Lipman no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 11/20/2018. (jae)
|
| Filing 21 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Nike, Inc..(Baugh, Mark) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER GRANTING #18 DEFENDANT SECURIAN'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. Defendant Securian's Answer or other responsive pleading is due by or before 12/5/2018. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 11/15/2018. (shl)
|
| Filing 19 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #18 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (Unopposed Motion) filed by Securian Life Insurance Company has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: Filer did not indicate "proposed order submitted". Please submit the proposed order (in word format) if not previously emailed to chambers. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. (jae) |
| Filing 18 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (Unopposed Motion) by Securian Life Insurance Company. (Simpkins, Kelly) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Securian Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Clint D. Vanderver)(Simpkins, Kelly) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Kelly D. Simpkins on behalf of Securian Life Insurance Company (Simpkins, Kelly) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 11/5/2018. (shl)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING #11 UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. Nike, Inc.'s Answer or other responsive pleading due 11/19/2018. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 11/5/2018. (shl)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Anthony Baugh on behalf of Nike, Inc. (Baugh, Mark) |
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Nike, Inc.. (Nelson, Kristine) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Unopposed Motion (Proposed Order Submitted) by Nike, Inc.. (Nelson, Kristine) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristine E. Nelson on behalf of Nike, Inc. (Nelson, Kristine) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Charlesetta Biggs as to Securian Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1-- Affidavit of Service, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2-- Return Mail Receipt)(Gilbert, Justin) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Charlesetta Biggs as to Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1-- Affidavit of Service, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2-- Return Mail Receipt)(Gilbert, Justin) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Securian Life Insurance Company. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jae) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Nike, Inc.. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jae) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 2 Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jae) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nike, Inc., Securian Life Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNWDC-2893575), filed by Charlesetta Biggs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Gilbert, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
