GPT Properties Trust v. 3M Company et al
Plaintiff: GPT Properties Trust
Defendant: Solar Security Films, Inc., 3M Company and D.L. Schmitz Waterproofing & Restoration Company, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv02463
Filed: July 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Sheryl H Lipman
Referring Judge: Diane K Vescovo
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2019 Filing 25 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (Tom, Robert)
September 9, 2019 Filing 24 Corporate Disclosure Statement by 3M Company. (Smith, Mary)
September 4, 2019 Filing 23 SUMMONS Returned Executed by GPT Properties Trust as to Solar Security Films, Inc.. (Van Horn, Daniel)
September 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting #21 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. [**TEXT ORDER ONLY--NO IMAGE ATTACHED.**] Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 9/4/19. (Lipman, Sheryl)
September 4, 2019 Filing 21 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-3157480) by 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing - Federal, #2 Certificate of Good Standing - State MN)(Graham, Dadri-Anne)
September 3, 2019 Filing 20 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GPT Properties Trust. (Van Namen, Kathryn)
August 30, 2019 Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathryn K. Van Namen on behalf of GPT Properties Trust (Van Namen, Kathryn)
August 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting #17 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. [**TEXT ORDER ONLY--NO IMAGE ATTACHED.**] Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 8/29/19. (Lipman, Sheryl)
August 29, 2019 Filing 17 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice with Proposed Order Submitted (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-3153951) by 3M Company. (Bullard, Elsa)
August 28, 2019 Filing 16 *To be resubmitted - this is not a notice of appearance* - NOTICE of Appearance by Dadri-Anne Alecia Graham on behalf of 3M Company (Attachments: #1 Supplement Certificate of Good Standing)(Graham, Dadri-Anne) Modified on 8/28/2019 (jae).
August 20, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Katherine Smith on behalf of 3M Company (Smith, Mary)
August 20, 2019 Filing 14 SETTING LETTER: Scheduling Conference set for Friday, September 20, 2019 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 1 - Memphis before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. (smm)
August 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING #9 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. Defendant 3M Company shall file an Answer or other response by or before 9/18/2019. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 8/16/2019. (shl)
August 16, 2019 Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, by D.L. Schmitz Waterproofing & Restoration Company, Inc..(Martin, Laura)
August 16, 2019 Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by D.L. Schmitz Waterproofing & Restoration Company, Inc.. (Martin, Laura)
August 16, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura S. Martin on behalf of D.L. Schmitz Waterproofing & Restoration Company, Inc. (Martin, Laura)
August 16, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, or Otherwise Respond, Proposed Order Submitted, by 3M Company. (Tom, Robert)
August 6, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by GPT Properties Trust as to 3M Company. (Van Horn, Daniel)
July 30, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by GPT Properties Trust as to D.L. Schmitz Waterproofing & Restoration Company, Inc.. (Van Horn, Daniel)
July 22, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to 3M Company, D.L. Schmitz Waterproofing & Restoration Company, Inc., Solar Security Films, Inc.. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (Attachments: #1 DL Schmitz summons, #2 Solar Security summons)(jae)
July 22, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae)
July 22, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae)
July 22, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae)
July 22, 2019 Filing 2 Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Chief Magistrate Judge Diane K. Vescovo added. (jae)
July 19, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 3M Company, D.L. Schmitz Waterproofing & Restoration Company, Inc., Solar Security Films, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNWDC-3118935), filed by GPT Properties Trust. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Construction Contract, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Change Order No. 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - 3M Warranty, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons Summons to 3M Company, #6 Summons Summons to D.L. Schmitz Waterproofing & Restoration Company, Inc., #7 Summons Summons to Solar Security Films, Inc.)(Van Horn, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GPT Properties Trust v. 3M Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Solar Security Films, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 3M Company
Represented By: Elsa Bullard
Represented By: Robert F. Tom
Represented By: Dadri-Anne Alecia Graham
Represented By: Mary Katherine Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D.L. Schmitz Waterproofing & Restoration Company, Inc.
Represented By: Laura S. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GPT Properties Trust
Represented By: Daniel Warren Van Horn
Represented By: Kathryn K. Van Namen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?