Weimar v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Jonathan H. Weimar
Defendant: Geico Advantage Insurance Company
Not Yet Classified: Clerk W. Aaron Hall
Case Number: 2:2019cv02698
Filed: October 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: John T Fowlkes
Referring Judge: Tu M Pham
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by William E. Routt, III on behalf of Jonathan H. Weimar (Routt, William)
November 14, 2019 Filing 11 SETTING LETTER: Scheduling Conference set for Wednesday, 12/18/2019 09:15 AM in Courtroom 3 - Memphis before Judge John T. Fowlkes Jr.. (wrh)
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record and Substitute Counsel. Added attorney W. Preston Battle, IV for Geico Advantage Insurance Company and attorney Mitchell S. Ashkenaz is terminated, signed by Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr. on 11/13/19. (Fowlkes, J.)
November 13, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney proposed order submitted by Geico Advantage Insurance Company. (Ashkenaz, Mitchell)
October 18, 2019 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Geico Advantage Insurance Company.(Ashkenaz, Mitchell)
October 17, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Mitchell S. Ashkenaz on behalf of Geico Advantage Insurance Company (Ashkenaz, Mitchell)
October 15, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (agj)
October 15, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (agj)
October 15, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (agj)
October 15, 2019 Filing 3 Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr and Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (agj)
October 11, 2019 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Geico Advantage Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Geico Corporation, Other Affiliate Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. for Geico Advantage Insurance Company.. (Lewis, George)
October 11, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Geico Advantage Insurance Company from Chancery Court of Shelby County, TN, case number CH-18-0976 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNWDC-3190356), filed by Geico Advantage Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Part 1) - State Court Pldgs, #2 Exhibit A (Part 2) - State Court Pldgs, #3 Exhibit A (Part 3) - State Court Pldgs, #4 Exhibit A (Part 4) - State Court Pldgs, #5 Exhibit A (Part 5) - State Court Pldgs, #6 Exhibit A (Part 6) - State Court Pldgs, #7 Exhibit A (Part 7) - State Court Pldgs, #8 Exhibit A (Part 8) - State Court Pldgs, #9 Exhibit A (Part 9) - State Court Pldgs, #10 Exhibit A (Part 10) - State Court Pldgs, #11 Exhibit A (Part 11) - State Court Pldgs, #12 Exhibit A (Part 12) - State Court Pldgs, #13 Exhibit A (Part 13) - State Court Pldgs, #14 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #15 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lewis, George)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weimar v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Geico Advantage Insurance Company
Represented By: George T. Lewis, III
Represented By: Mitchell S. Ashkenaz
Represented By: Walter Preston Battle, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan H. Weimar
Represented By: William F. Burns
Represented By: Frank L. Watson, III
Represented By: Malcolm Brown Futhey, III
Represented By: William E. Routt, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: Clerk W. Aaron Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?