Black et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
| Cathleen J. Black and James L. Black |
| Boston Scientific Corporation |
| 2:2020cv02202 |
| March 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Sheryl H Lipman |
| Tu M Pham |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF SETTING: (TEXT ONLY - NO IMAGE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY): The parties are hereby notified that the Scheduling Conference currently set for Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 9:00 AM will be held via Skype Video before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. The Court will send, via email, to each attorney, an invitation for the conference. Parties shall consult the # Skype for Business webpage for instructions on downloading the proper extensions for their computer.(smm) |
| Filing 22 RESPONSE in Support re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation's Reply Brief in Support of its Partial Motion to Dismiss filed by Boston Scientific Corporation. (Waldrop, Locke) |
Filing 21
ORDER granting #20 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. [**TEXT ORDER ONLY--NO IMAGE ATTACHED.**] Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 4/24/20. (Lipman, Sheryl)
|
| Filing 20 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $150 receipt number TNWDC-3333907) by Boston Scientific Corporation. (Bassin, Alana) Receipt info added on 4/24/2020 (cbs). |
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #18 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. [**TEXT ORDER ONLY--NO IMAGE ATTACHED.**] Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 4/24/20. (Lipman, Sheryl)
|
| Filing 18 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (proposed order submitted) (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-3333797) by Cathleen J. Black, James L. Black. (Kuntz, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) filed by Cathleen J. Black, James L. Black. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Faes, Andrew) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. [**TEXT ORDER ONLY--NO IMAGE ATTACHED.**] Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 4/17/20. (Lipman, Sheryl)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-3329454) by Boston Scientific Corporation. (Anderson, Rachelle) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by James L. Black as to Boston Scientific Corporation. (Smith, Bruce) |
| Filing 13 SETTING LETTER: Scheduling Conference set for Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 1 - Memphis before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. (smm) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. [**TEXT ORDER ONLY--NO IMAGE ATTACHED.**] Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 4/10/20. (Lipman, Sheryl)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (proposed order submitted) (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-3325128) by Cathleen J. Black, James L. Black. (Faes, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Boston Scientific Corporation. (Tom, Robert) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Boston Scientific Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum)(Tom, Robert) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Locke Houston Waldrop on behalf of Boston Scientific Corporation (Waldrop, Locke) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert F. Tom on behalf of Boston Scientific Corporation (Tom, Robert) |
| Filing 6 Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jld) (csf). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jld) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jld) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jld) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Boston Scientific Corporation. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jld) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Boston Scientific Corporation (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNWDC-3312145), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for Boston Scientific Corporation)(Smith, Bruce) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
