Crawford v. Allenbrooke Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC d/b/a Allenbrooke Nursing and Rehabilitation Center et al
| Marvius Ray Crawford |
| Donald T. Denz, Allenbrooke Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC d/b/a Allenbrooke Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Norbert A. Bennett, Aurora Cares, LLC, D & N, LLC and DTD HC, LLC |
| 2:2021cv02054 |
| January 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Thomas L Parker |
| Tu M Pham |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
[**TEXT ORDER ONLY--NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED**] Defendants move for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's complaint. (ECF No. #13 .) Plaintiff does not oppose the motion. (Id. at PageID 167.) For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS Defendants' motion. Defendants have until April 2, 2021, to respond. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 3/19/2021. (ljt)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, (proposed order submitted) by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum in Support of Motion for Extension to Respond to Complaint)(Siler, Brent)
|
|
Filing 12
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Leslie Wilson on 02/26/2021, filed by Marvius Ray Crawford. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Service, #2 Affidavit Affidavit of Service, #3 Affidavit Affidavit of Service)(Acerra, Carey)
|
|
Filing 11
Summons Issued as to DTD HC, LLC. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (agj)
|
|
Filing 10
Summons Issued as to Norbert A. Bennett. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (agj)
|
|
Filing 9
Summons Issued as to Donald T. Denz. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (agj)
|
|
Filing 8
Summons Issued as to D & N, LLC. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (agj)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons Issued as to Aurora Cares, LLC. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (agj)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued as to Allenbrooke Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC d/b/a Allenbrooke Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (agj)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (agj)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (agj)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (agj)
|
|
Filing 2
Judge Thomas L. Parker and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (agj)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3531401), filed by Marvius Ray Crawford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Affidavit Certificate of Good Faith, #3 Affidavit Affidavit of Service with Certificate of Mailing, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons Summons to Allenbrooke Nursing and Rehabilitation Center LLC, #6 Summons Summons to Aurora Cares, LLC, #7 Summons Summons to D & N, LLC, #8 Summons Summons to Donald T. Denz, #9 Summons Summons to DTD HC LLC, #10 Summons Summons to Norbert A. Bennett)(Arnold, Deena)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
