Kimmons v. Corley
| Anquenetta Kimmons |
| Brandon Corley |
| Temiika Gipson |
| 2:2021cv02120 |
| March 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Annie T Christoff |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE by Brandon Corley Service of Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents to Plaintiff (Walden, Bailey) |
| Filing 16 SETTING LETTER: Jury Trial set for Monday, 5/16/2022 at 9:30 AM before Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr.; Pretrial Conference set for Friday, 5/6/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr.; Proposed Pretrial Order due by 4/29/2022. (jam) |
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER: The following ddls/scheds were established: join parties ddl 06/08/21; amend pleadings ddl 06/08/21; ADR/Mediaation ddl 01/19/22; complete all discovery 12/20/21; expert disclosure for pltf ddl 10/21/21 and 11/22/21 for deft; document productions, interrogatories, and requests for admissions ddl 11/05/21; dispositive motions ddl 01/19/22; Jury Trial set Monday, 05/16/2022 at 9:30 a.m. (est. 2 days); Pretrial Conference set Friday, 05/06/2022 at 10:00 A.M.; Joint Proposed Pretrial Order due 04/29/2022. Signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 04/15/21. (Mays, Samuel)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Dismiss punitive damages claim. Signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr on 04/15/2021. (Mays, Samuel)
|
| Filing 13 MINUTES: TELEPHONE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held on 04/15/2021 before Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr.; Drayton Berkley appeared for the pltf; Bailey L. Walden appeared for the deft. Pltfs Counsel confirm it will not pursue punitive damages. In re: #9 motion dismiss plaintiffs punitive damages: Granted. Order to be entered by the Court. Proposed scheduling order adopted. The following ddls/scheds were established: join parties ddl 06/08/21; amend pleadings ddl 06/08/21; ADR/Mediaation ddl 01/19/22; complete all discovery 12/20/21; expert disclosure for pltf ddl 10/21/21 and 11/22/21 for deft; document productions, interrogatories, and requests for admissions ddl 11/05/21; dispositive motions ddl 01/19/22; Jury Trial set Monday, 05/16/2022 at 9:30 a.m. (est. 2 days); Pretrial Conference set Friday, 05/06/2022 at 10:00 A.M.; Joint Proposed Pretrial Order due 04/29/2022. (Court Reporter: Tina Gibson) (jam) |
| Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (Proposed Order Submitted). (Walden, Bailey) |
| Filing 11 SETTING LETTER: A TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference is set for 4/15/2021 at 02:15 PM before Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr.(der) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Brandon Corley.(Walden, Bailey) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Punitive Damages Claim by Brandon Corley. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum)(Walden, Bailey) |
| Filing 8 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #7 Answer to Complaint filed by Brandon Corley, #6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Punitive Damages Claim filed by Brandon Corley has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: the pleadings have "wet" signatures and not the required electronic signatures. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. The filer has one business day to correct the deficiency. (agj) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Brandon Corley.(Walden, Bailey) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Punitive Damages Claim by Brandon Corley. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum)(Walden, Bailey) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (btg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (btg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (btg) |
| Filing 2 Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff added. (btg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Brandon Corley from Shelby County Circuit Court, case number CT-0109-21 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3556193), filed by Brandon Corley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3)(Walden, Bailey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
