Cordova Retail Management, LLC v. Cajun Seafood Cordova, LLC et al
| Cordova Retail Management, LLC |
| Cajun Seafood Cordova, LLC and Liying Yang |
| 2:2021cv02130 |
| March 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| Thomas L Parker |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Cordova Retail Management, LLC STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGEMENT & MOTION TO DISMISS (Burgener, Joshua) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 Proposed MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Complaint filed by Cordova Retail Management, LLC. (Burgener, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 Proposed MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Complaint by Cordova Retail Management, LLC. (Burgener, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Cordova Retail Management, LLC. Cajun Seafood Cordova, LLC waiver sent on 3/24/2021, answer due 5/24/2021. (Burgener, Joshua) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Cordova Retail Management, LLC OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Burgener, Joshua) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (btg) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (btg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (btg) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(btg) |
| Filing 2 Judge Thomas L. Parker and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (btg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3558340), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit)(Burgener, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
