Drexel Chemical Company v. Gowan Company LLC
Drexel Chemical Company |
Gowan Company LLC |
2:2022cv02438 |
July 6, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Charmiane G Claxton |
Mark S Norris |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Sealed Document Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Clerk's Entry of Default. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A: Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, #2 Exhibit Ex. B: Declaration of Joshua D. Wilson)(Wilson, Joshua) |
![]() |
Filing 15 Sealed Document Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief Out of Time Based on New Information. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A: Reply Brief, #2 Exhibit Ex. B: Declaration of Joshua D. Wilson, #3 Exhibit Ex. C: Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, #4 Exhibit Ex. D: Certificate of Consultation)(Wilson, Joshua) |
Filing 14 SEALED RESPONSE to Motion re #13 SEALED MOTION to Vacate and Set Aside Entry of Default filed by Drexel Chemical Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Dec. of Counsel, #2 Exhibit Dec. Ex. 1, #3 Exhibit Dec. Ex. 2, #4 Exhibit Dec. Ex. 3, #5 Exhibit Dec. Ex. 4, #6 Exhibit Dec. Ex. 5, #7 Affidavit Dec. of Priv. Proc Server)(Rafferty, Michael) |
Filing 13 SEALED MOTION to Vacate and Set Aside Entry of Default by Gowan Company LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A: Declaration of Josh Wilson, #2 Exhibit Ex. B: Rule 7.2 Certificate, #3 Exhibit Ex. C: Proposed Order, #4 Exhibit Ex. D: State Court Action)(Wilson, Joshua) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua David Wilson on behalf of Gowan Company LLC (Wilson, Joshua) |
Filing 11 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Gowan Company LLC. Motion terminated: #10 MOTION for Entry of Default filed by Drexel Chemical Company. (jae) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Entry of Default by Drexel Chemical Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Rafferty, Michael) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Drexel Chemical Company as to Gowan Company LLC. (Rafferty, Michael) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Louis Bernsen on behalf of Drexel Chemical Company (Bernsen, Louis) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Gowan Company LLC. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (agj) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (agj) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (agj) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (agj) |
Filing 3 Judge Mark S. Norris and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (agj) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Summons by Michael F. Rafferty on behalf of Drexel Chemical Company. (Rafferty, Michael) |
Filing 1 SEALED COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment, Repudiation of Contract, Breach of Duty of Implied Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, and Request for Speedy Hearing and Expedited Pretrial Plan against All Plaintiffs (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3913887), filed by Drexel Chemical Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Rafferty, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Drexel Chemical Company v. Gowan Company LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Drexel Chemical Company | |
Represented By: | Michael F. Rafferty |
Represented By: | Louis Bernsen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Gowan Company LLC | |
Represented By: | Joshua David Wilson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.