Valenti et al v. MEB Loan Trust VI et al
| Jill Valenti and Paul Valenti |
| MEB Loan Trust VI, Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, P.C., Skyline Realty LLC, MEB REO Trust VI and Computer Share Loan Services, LLC a/k/a Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC |
| Clerk W. Aaron Hall |
| 2:2022cv02819 |
| November 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SETTING LETTER (TEXT ONLY - NO IMAGE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY): The Telephone Scheduling Conference is RESET to Tuesday, 3/14/2023 at 1:45 PM before Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. (jam) |
| Filing 10 SETTING LETTER: A TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference is set for 3/3/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. (der) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Computer Share Loan Services, LLC a/k/a Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, MEB Loan Trust VI, MEB REO Trust VI.(Roberts, Lauren) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, P.C..(Varghese, Paulson) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Substitute, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr on 12/02/2022. Paulson Varghese is terminated. (Mays, Samuel)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Computer Share Loan Services, LLC a/k/a Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, MEB Loan Trust VI, Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, P.C.. (Roberts, Lauren) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (mlk) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (mlk) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mlk) |
| Filing 2 Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (mlk) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, P.C., MEB Loan Trust VI from Chancery Court for the 30th District at Memphis, case number Ch-22-1479 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-4021159), filed by Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, P.C., MEB Loan Trust VI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Varghese, Paulson) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
