Pritchard v. Thompson et al
| Chris A. Pritchard |
| Aaron Thompson, Harman Connected Services and Samsung Electronics |
| 2:2022cv02838 |
| December 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Jon Phipps McCalla |
| Tu M Pham |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 MOTION for Leave to be Temporarily Excused from Compliance with Local Patent Rules Pending Ruling on Motion to Dismiss proposed order submitted by Harman Connected Services, Aaron Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum)(Woo, Darryl) |
| Filing 20 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue by Harman Connected Services, Aaron Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration of Thompson, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G)(Woo, Darryl) |
| Filing 19 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US D 904, 258 S; US 17/211,384. (cdi) |
| Filing 18 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Harman Connected Services, Samsung Electronics, Aaron Thompson, filed by Chris A. Pritchard.(mlk) |
| Filing 17 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Harman Connected Services identifying Corporate Parent Harman International Industries, Inc. for Harman Connected Services.. (Woo, Darryl) |
| Filing 16 TEXT ORDER granting #14 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #15 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on January 11, 2023. (cmp) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice proposed order submitted (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-4048642) by Harman Connected Services, Aaron Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(Woo, Darryl) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice proposed order submitted (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number ATNWDC-4048445) by Harman Connected Services, Aaron Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(Wu, Huiya) |
| Filing 13 TEXT ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. For good cause shown, the unopposed motion is GRANTED. Defendants' response to the complaint is due February 6, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on January 6, 2023. (TEXT ORDER ONLY - NO IMAGE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY) (cmp) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint; Proposed Order Submitted by Harman Connected Services, Aaron Thompson. (Ginther, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Ginther on behalf of Harman Connected Services, Aaron Thompson (Ginther, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chris A. Pritchard as to Harman Connected Services. (mlk) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chris A. Pritchard as to Samsung Electronics. (mlk) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chris A. Pritchard as to Aaron Thompson. (mlk) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Harman Connected Services, Samsung Electronics, Aaron Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Thompson Summons, #2 Harman Summons)(jae) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE: Signed agreement to receive notice of electronic filing (NEF) by Chris A. Pritchard (csf) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (csf) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Complex track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 2 Case initiation fee: PAID $ 402.00, receipt number 200000397 (csf) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT Under 28 U.S.C. 1338pt against All Defendants, filed by Chris A. Pritchard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Judicial Cards)(csf) |
| Pursuant to Administrative Order 2013-05, this case has been assigned to the United States magistrate judge for management of all pretrial matters. Pursuant to Local Rule 4.1(b)(1), the plaintiff shall present the Clerk with a properly completed summons for each defendant, and the Clerk shall issue the summons(es) to the plaintiff for service on the defendant(s). (csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
