Martin J. Walsh, Secretary of Labor v. Mid South Senior Care, LLC et al
| Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor and Martin J. Walsh |
| Mid South Senior Care, LLC, Chad Gilliland and Kaye Schultz |
| 2:2023cv02097 |
| February 23, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Thomas L Parker |
| Tu M Pham |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Martin J. Walsh. Kaye Schultz waiver sent on 3/1/2023, answer due 5/1/2023. (Cooper, Taylor) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Martin J. Walsh. Chad Gilliland waiver sent on 3/1/2023, answer due 5/1/2023. (Cooper, Taylor) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Martin J. Walsh. Mid South Senior Care, LLC waiver sent on 3/1/2023, answer due 5/1/2023. (Cooper, Taylor) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Chad Gilliland, Mid South Senior Care, LLC, Kaye Schultz. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (agj) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Summons by Taylor D. Cooper on behalf of Martin J. Walsh. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Cooper, Taylor) |
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 2/28/2023. (jdgc)
|
| Filing 5 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice proposed order submitted (Fee paid as part of previous filing) by Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor. (Cooper, Taylor) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (mlk) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (mlk) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mlk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Cooper, Taylor) |
| Judge Thomas L. Parker and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (mlk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
