Hakis & Sons, Inc. v. Truist Financial Corporation
| Hakis & Sons, Inc. |
| Truist Financial Corporation |
| Clerk W. Aaron Hall |
| 2:2023cv02174 |
| March 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Annie T Christoff |
| Mark S Norris |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 5/5/2023. (Norris, Mark)
|
| Filing 10 First MOTION to Extend Deadline Proposed order submitted by Hakis & Sons, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum In support of Motion To Extend)(Weissman, Larry) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Truist Financial Corporation. (Waldrop, Locke) |
| Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Truist Financial Corporation. (Waldrop, Locke) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (agj) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (agj) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (agj) |
| Filing 4 Judge Mark S. Norris and Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff added. (agj) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert F. Tom on behalf of Truist Financial Corporation f/k/a Suntrust Bank, Inc., a/k/a Truist Bank (Tom, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Correction to #1 Notice of Removal, /Notice of Filing of Corrected Exhibit B to Notice of Removal (ECF No. 1). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Corrected Exhibit B to Notice of Removal)(Waldrop, Locke) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Truist Financial Corporation f/k/a Suntrust Bank, Inc., a/k/a Truist Bank from Chancery Court of Tennessee for the Thirtieth Judicial District at Memphis, case number CH-23-0216 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-4109432), filed by Truist Financial Corporation f/k/a Suntrust Bank, Inc., a/k/a Truist Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Waldrop, Locke) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
