Petlechkov v. Federal Express Corporation et al
| Dimitar Petlechkov |
| Federal Express Corporation and FedEx Corporation |
| 2:2023cv02231 |
| April 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Thomas L Parker |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Pursuant to Administrative Order 2013-05, this case has been assigned to the United States magistrate judge for management of all pretrial matters, including screening of the complaint to determine whether or not summons shall be issued by the Clerk pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and Local Rule 4.1(b)(2) (csf) |
| Filing 12 SEALED MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis by Dimitar Petlechkov. (jae) |
Filing 11
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 5/8/2023. (jdgc)
|
| Filing 10 Judge Thomas L. Parker added. Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr no longer assigned to case. (agj) |
| Filing 9 Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr added. Chief Judge Sheryl H. Lipman no longer assigned to case. (jae) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (csf) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE: Agreement to Receive Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by Dimitar Petlechkov (csf) |
| Filing 4 Pro Se MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Dimitar Petlechkov. (csf) |
| Filing 3 MOTION Pro Se Ex Parte Motion to Issue Summonses and For Order Directing Service by the Clerk's Office by Certified Mail by Dimitar Petlechkov. (csf) |
| Filing 2 Pro Se ExParte Motion to Waive Filing Fee and Proceed In Forma Pauperis and For Leave to Register as E-Filer Through the Court's CM/ECF System by Dimitar Petlechkov. (csf) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Federal Express Corporation and FedEx Corporation, filed by Dimitar Petlechkov. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
