Williams v. Alexander, et al
| Clifford Earl Williams |
| SCDC Director Alexander and Chief Baldwin |
| 2:2023cv02692 |
| October 31, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Tu M Pham |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned (inmate discharged) as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Clifford Williams. (jae) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Clifford Williams. (jae) |
Filing 4
ORDER. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on November 7, 2023. (cmd)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Clifford Earl Williams. (jae) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Alexander, Baldwin, filed by Clifford Earl Williams. (Attachments: #1 envelope, #2 Judicial Assignment cards)(jae) |
| Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-01 case reassigned to Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham. (jae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
